[cmake-developers] maintainer model for CMake modules

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Monday 12 February 2007 23:44, you wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 12 February 2007 01:46, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think not many modules will get three votes. Most people will just not
> > care I'm afraid.
>
> ...
>
> > Does that mean the bugs will no longer be in the cmake bug tracker ? That
> > doesn't sound good. I don't want my inbox filled with bugreports without
> > a bugracker backing them up.
>
> The problem is that there are TONS of bugs about modules and I just can
> not get to all of them, and by the time I get to them they are stale.

Yes, I understand that.

> We need a new solution. I was using cygwin as a model for this.  If
> Bill, Alex, and Brad vote, that is three votes. Basically the voting
> gets people to take it a bit more serious and gives us a chance to look
> at the formating and code, and it lets users know what is out there.   I
> suppose the bugs can still go in the bug tracker but they will have to
> be assigned to the maintainer.  If you have another idea, that would be
> great.   But, the current mode of operation is just not working.

Add a new component "Modules" to the project "CMake" or a new 
project "CMake-Modules" so they are clearly separated ?
Would this be enough ?
I just would like to keep them somewhere in the bug tracker, some emails in my 
inbox will be forgotten after some weeks.

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net