[cmake-developers] Review request: extract-cmMessenger branch
Michael Scott
michael.scott250 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 29 03:37:29 EST 2016
> * Decrease responsibilities of the cmake class. CMake uses too few
> classes for too many things
I certainly agree with that, the cmake class is very large at this point.
> * Make it possible to make add first-class handling of messages about
> missing packages (for example) to cmake-gui by making methods on
> cmMessenger virtual and subclassing
This sounds like a good idea and makes a lot of sense.
While working on the message functionality previously it felt like it
was tacked on as an afterthought, I think moving in this direction will
help lead to message functionality that can be expanded and improved
upon much more easily in the future.
This may be a stupid question, but I previously wondered why CMake
doesn't use (or at least obviously use) a standard logging library,
similar to log4j, for some of this stuff?
Cheers,
Michael
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list