[cmake-developers] RFC: CMake precompiled header support and custom compiler based implementation
James Johnston
johnstonj.public at codenest.com
Fri Oct 30 01:48:29 EDT 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-bounces at cmake.org]
> On Behalf Of Daniel Pfeifer
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 08:57
> To: Taylor Braun-Jones
> Cc: CMake Developers
> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] RFC: CMake precompiled header support
> and custom compiler based implementation
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Taylor Braun-Jones <taylor at braun-
> jones.org> wrote:
> > What's the status of this PCH feature? Does it need testers? More
> > design input? I'd love to see this feature in a future CMake release.
> > Willing to help.
>
> I haven't worked on it for quite some time as I currently don't have a
project
> which needs it.
> But I agree that we should get it into CMake, even if it does not
> support
all
> generators yet.
> Support for additional generators can be added successively.
>
> I will rebase my branch to master on the weekend, ie port it to
> cmGeneratorTarget.
> Then you are free to help with review, testing, and additional generators.
>
> Which generators are the most important for you?
I'd also love to see some progress on PCH support, though I haven't had much
time recently... I'd be quite happy to test however with the below compilers
and generators - all of which we would use PCH support with:
Generators:
* Ninja
* Visual Studio 2008 (eventually 2015)
* Although we're not currently using it, CMake would be pretty broken
without supporting: Unix Makefiles
Compilers:
* Visual C++ 2008 (eventually 2015): both Ninja and VS generators
* Embarcadero bcc32 compiler: Ninja
* GCC: Ninja
Best regards,
James Johnston
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20151030/ba71d2fa/attachment.html>
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list