[cmake-developers] FindThreads_overhaul topic

[Brad King]

On 10/08/2014 11:37 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> All credits go to Timo Rothenpieler

Okay.  Please add a "Co-Author: " or "Inspired-by: " footer line to give
this credit.

> I'm not sure about Threads::Interface, it sounds so "generic" or "abstract" to 
> me, but this target offers no abstraction of the thread API. All others have 
> different up- and downsides, so I think I'll stay with Threads::Threads, that 
> is the one that probably results in the least blame for a badly chosen name.

On second thought I agree Threads::Interface is too generic.  It exposes
an implementation detail in the name.  I agree Threads::Threads is the
best or now.  I suspect other packages will encounter a similar double-name
later.

Thanks,
-Brad