[cmake-developers] Failing CMake WinStorePhone tests

[David Cole]

I just put VS 2013 Professional on it within the last two weeks. It
might be the original release of VS 2013... I have to install Update 4
for it, but won't be able to get to that until tomorrow.

So: original VS 2013 Pro, all optional components installed.

Will this magically go away if I apply the Update 4 tomorrow....?

Let me know if you need more specific information, or if you'd like me
to try something before you push a commit with a fix.

Thanks,
David


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Gilles Khouzam
<Gilles.Khouzam at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Can you give me some information on your current setup? What build of VS do you have installed, which options? I think that the detection logic for the tests is missing some cases. I'm guessing that this is similar to what I recently fixed in CMake for the express editions, the same detection logic might need to be moved over to the test script.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Cole [mailto:DLRdave at aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:42
> To: Gilles Khouzam
> Cc: Brad King; cmake-developers at cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Failing CMake WinStorePhone tests
>
> I was hoping you'd say that! :-)
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Gilles Khouzam <Gilles.Khouzam at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Let me take a look at what's going on.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brad King [mailto:brad.king at kitware.com]
>> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 08:38
>> To: David Cole
>> Cc: cmake-developers at cmake.org; Gilles Khouzam
>> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Failing CMake WinStorePhone tests
>>
>> On 11/14/2014 11:27 AM, David Cole via cmake-developers wrote:
>>> Should I expect these tests to pass using Ninja, or is that beyond
>>> the scope of the WinStorePhone support...?
>>
>> The VS generator is needed for the feature, but the tests that are failing hard-code use of specific Visual Studio generators regardless of the main generator being tested.
>>
>> I'll defer to Gilles as for what the problem might be.
>>
>> -Brad
>>