[cmake-developers] INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES property?
Brad King
brad.king at kitware.com
Fri Jun 7 09:29:56 EDT 2013
On 06/07/2013 09:22 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Brad King wrote:
>
>> Let me request this a third time and more explicitly: please revert
>> the INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES-prop topic from next and drop it until
>> the signature policy is ready. Introduce the signature policy as
>> CMP0022. After we've settled that topic and it is clean on the
>> dashboard then start again on INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES.
>
> I've reverted it from next.
>
> Given the orthogonality, I don't understand why you want the signature
> change in first. Renumbering the policies doesn't seem worthwhile.
It is a less-invasive change that also introduces the final tll
siganture. With those tll updates out of the way we will be able
to concentrate more on defining the behavior for the interface
policy. Currently the INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES-prop topic has
gone through a few iterations due to confusing the two. Let's
get the simpler one done first. Also, the signature policy will
be useful on its own if for some reason INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES
does not get finished for a while.
-Brad
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list