[cmake-developers] ninja test failing again...

Peter Kümmel syntheticpp at gmx.net
Wed Sep 5 09:16:13 EDT 2012


On 05.09.2012 13:31, Brad King wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 07:46 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> Any optimization that skips dependency checks should
>>> be done only for the first form, and never for the
>>> second form.  This distinction should cover the
>>> BuildDepends test case too.
>>
>> http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=34b0cf6a3823e0d54958a0f337308b4c35342cc3
>>
>> Is this better?
>
> Yes, thanks.  Please revert the other topic and merge
> this one instead.

OK, I merged this:

http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=7b2bf28e183b5eacc22fe3030f0439853746f0bd

>
> -Brad
>



More information about the cmake-developers mailing list