[cmake-developers] Automoc in cmake

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Tuesday 16 August 2011, David Cole wrote:
> 2011/8/16 Alexander Neundorf <neundorf at kde.org>:
> > On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >> 
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> > There is now a branch AutomocForQt on the cmake stage.
> >> > 
> >> > Docs and a test are still missing.
> >> 
> >> It has a test now. Docs are still missing.
> > 
> > Now it also has docs.
> > 
> > I haven't merged it to next yet.
> > 
> > Any objections ?
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cmake-developers mailing list
> > cmake-developers at cmake.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
> 
> Brad and I just read through some of your recent commits. In the
> Tests/CMakeLists.txt there's logic that looks like this:
> 
>   IF(NOT QT4_FOUND)
>     FIND_PACKAGE(Qt4)
>     IF(QT4_FOUND)
>       ...
>     ENDIF()
>   ENDIF()
> 
> Could you change it to this?
>   IF(NOT QT4_FOUND)
>     FIND_PACKAGE(Qt4)
>   ENDIF()
>   IF(QT4_FOUND)
>     ...
>   ENDIF()
> 
> That way, when we have builds of CMake where Qt is on (to build
> cmake-gui) it will run the test. As it stands now, looks like it will
> not run the test when we already *know* we have Qt available...

Hmm, yes. Not sure what I thought when writing this.
 
> After that, go ahead and merge to 'next' and see how it looks on the
> dashboard.

Done.
Can a merge to next actually also be undone ?

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20110816/fe9dfd2f/attachment.html>