[CMake] Tests with assert and Release build type

[Ruslan Baratov]

On 22-Dec-15 04:07, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Ruslan Baratov writes:
>
>> On 20-Dec-15 01:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>> Ruslan Baratov writes:
>>>
>>>> How about using RelWithDebInfo? See:
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/a/28124715/2288008
>>> Hmm, I'm probably missing something but how does that solve the issue
>>> with some targets requiring NDEBUG to be *undefined* and other targets
>>> requiring NDEBUG to be defined?
>> I don't think that building targets with different NDEBUG values is a
>> good idea. More correct approach will be to introduce custom macro to
>> allow checks (i.e. FOO_NDEBUG/FOO_DEBUG).
> Why not?
It is possible to hit situation when ODR will be violated, e.g. if 
somebody define optional member in structure with "#if defined(NDEBUG)" 
condition. Something like this: 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20833226/library-headers-and-define

>
> /M
>
> --
> Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
> email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
> twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus
>
> We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of
> life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be
> enthusiastic about.
>       -- Albert Einstein