[CMake] What's the best cmake continuous integration open source tool?

[James Sutherland]

I have been very pleased with Jenkins.  I have it building >10 different
projects on several platforms.  It is quite good at handling multiple build
configuations as well as project dependencies.

Coming from buildbot (yuck), Jenkins is really nice.

James



On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf <a.neundorf-work at gmx.net
> wrote:

> On Monday 15 July 2013, Avihay Eyal wrote:
> > Hi, my company uses CMake, and I want to use a CI framework. I wanted to
> > know, with which CI frameworks did you have a good experience.
> >
> > Since we work on a *private network*, travis
> > <http://about.travis-ci.org/>CI is not an option. Google have their
> > Blaze<
> http://google-engtools.blogspot.fr/2011/08/build-in-cloud-how-build-s
> > ystem-works.html>, but it's not open sourced, and somehow I'm not sure
> that
> > jenkins<http://jenkins-ci.org/>is the best CMake CI (not even sure it
> > supports it well).
> >
> >
> > Other than that, good integration with
> > ninja<http://martine.github.io/ninja/manual.html#_introduction>is a
> > plus.
> I'm using ctest scripts to drive the cont. builds (incl. testing etc.), and
> the results are uploaded to cdash.
>
> Alex
> --
>
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20130717/95e8dc1c/attachment.htm>