[CMake] Suggestions on documenting my CMake modules

[Rolf Eike Beer]

Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 20:58:45 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
> On Saturday 29 October 2011, Robert Dailey wrote:
> > I have several complex functions which require a ton of documentation. I
> > wanted to type this documentation directly in the cmake file right above
> > the function() itself, but it is turning out to be a formatting
> > nightmare.
> > 
> > What would you guys recommend as far as this kind of documentation goes?
> > It would be great if doxygen could scan CMake scripts and generate HTML
> > documentation out of them, but I don't know if this is possible. Also,
> > typing up the documentation in a wiki externally would ease the
> > formatting but would require people to go to an external source for
> > documentation that would otherwise be immediately available in the code
> > itself.
> 
> A patch to add some more formatting options to the cmake docs would be
> welcome
> :-)
> 
> Like e.g. *bold*, _italic_ and something for preformatted text.

Just that your /italic/ was _underlined_.

Eike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20111031/281292f2/attachment.pgp>