[CMake] The CMake bug tracker and "the backlog" of unresolved issues
Eric Noulard
eric.noulard at gmail.com
Fri Feb 4 03:16:17 EST 2011
2011/2/4 Tyler Roscoe <tyler at cryptio.net>:
> (removing cmake-developers; cross-posting felt wrong)
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:34:45PM -0500, David Cole wrote:
>> Since we do not have a status of "backlog" -- but we don't really use the
>> status values of "acknowledged" or "confirmed" very much, I am thinking we
>> could define "backlog" as:
>> status=acknowledged
>> AND
>> assigned to="" (empty string, none)
>
> WORKSFORME[1].
>
> Is there a way to display a note about this non-standard convention of
> the CMake bug tracker on the bug tracker itself? I could see new users
> being a little confused.
>
> Thanks,
> tyler
>
>
> [1] There are many things I do not miss about Bugzilla, but I've always
> liked WORKSFORME and I really miss the blunt yet economical WONTFIX.
Worksforme is not available in CMake Mantis config but "Wont'Fix" is :-]
In the "Resolution" field you can say "won't fix" ...
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
More information about the CMake
mailing list