[CMake] Anybody using IAR compiler here ?
Jesper Eskilson
jesper.eskilson at iar.se
Tue Jun 1 06:35:17 EDT 2010
On 05/31/2010 10:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 31 May 2010, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
>> On 05/30/2010 02:13 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>> That's also ok.
>>> Could you please post the output of the IAR AVR and ARM assemblers when
>>> called without any arguments here ?
>>> (or put them into http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10176 )
>>
>> The first non-empty line is for ARM and Atmel AVR, respectively:
>>
>> IAR Assembler V5.41.2.51793/W32 for ARM
>> IAR Assembler V5.50.0.50277/W32 for Atmel AVR
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> While we are at it, do the C and C++ compilers behave the same way, i.e. print
> the version information when called without arguments ?
Yes.
> How does that output look like then ?
IAR ANSI C/C++ Compiler V5.41.2.51793/W32 for ARM
IAR C/C++ Compiler V5.50.0.50277/W32 for Atmel AVR
> Does it differ between the AVR and ARM compilers ? They seemed to be quite
> different in their command lines etc.
They do differ a bit in their command lines, mostly depending on the
different capabilities. One such difference is that ARM is ELF/Dwarf
based, and the AVR-compiler uses the Ubrof object file format.
--
Jesper Eskilson
Developer
IAR Systems
http://www.iar.com
More information about the CMake
mailing list