[CMake] Debug/Release configurations for codeblocks ?

[Michael Jackson]

On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Jackson
> <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
>> Because it may horrendously interfere with my current established  
>> workflows
>
> Why?
>
>> but I would be open to trying this out. The main issue I can think  
>> of is the
>> whole release/debug versions of libraries clobbering each other  
>> during the
>> build. This would force an updated policy for the decorating of
>> library/executable names or generating sub folders for each type of  
>> build
>> configuration.
>
> Doesn't Code Blocks have a convention like this already?
>
>> Didn't we just discuss this in another thread?
>
> Yes, we did.
>
>> The default is for CMake to generate a "Release" configuration for  
>> Makefile
>> based projects. ie, if you do NOT specify or otherwise set  
>> CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
>> then you will be a "Release" configuration.
>
> AFAIK that's false.
>
> Olaf

Hmm. At some point it was because I specifically asked on this list a  
number of years ago. Maybe things have changed.
___________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer       mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio