[CMake] Coverage information overestimated? Globbing for *.gcno instead of *.gcda?

[Tom Vercauteren]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 17:51, Bill Hoffman <bill.hoffman at kitware.com> wrote:
> Daniel Blezek wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>>  I bumped into this problem as well.  We had several classes that were
>> compiled, but no methods in them were run.  CTest ignored them and we
>> didn't
>> have any coverage information on our dashboard.  I would second this
>> recommendation to accumulate coverage based on what is compiled.  As far
>> as
>> I'm concerned code that is not executed is totally broken, but there is no
>> way to have CTest/CDash tell us.
>>
>
> Thanks, I get it now...
>
> Tom, Please create a feature request.  If you have a patch that would be
> even better, if not, I will put it on the list.

The feature request and patch are on the bug tracker:
http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=8932

Tom