[CMake] General questions
Yang Zhang
yanghatespam at gmail.com
Sun Feb 24 17:24:37 EST 2008
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Sonntag 24 Februar 2008 schrieb Yang Zhang:
>> I understand your point, but support for cmake is not as ubiquitous as
>> it is for autotools. For instance, a cross-platform build system I'm
>> using (a bitbake/openembedded derivative) does not support cmake. As
>> another example, a tool I use for best-effort management of software
>> packages (http://toastball.net/toast/) does not support cmake.
>
> If it is derived from bitbake, why is it inferior to it? Bitbake supports any
> kind of build method, not just autotools.
>
> HS
> _______________________________________________
> CMake mailing list
> CMake at cmake.org
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Yes, I could add a cmake-handling base script for bitbake; similarly, I
could modify `toast` to work with cmake. My point is that support for
cmake is not as ubiquitous as support for autotools.
--
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/
More information about the CMake
mailing list