[CMake] improve the CMake language?

[Juan Sanchez]

I was reading exactly the link you sent, and the same one you accused
Brandon of not reading.  If there were supplemental materials, you
should have sent them.  I am not a lawyer.

To be honest, the only compelling languages I've seen so far in this
discussion is lua and tcl.  This is because they are small and appear to
be ideal for embedding.

Not that speed is super important, but I know of at least one hosting
provider making exceptions for ruby scripts, because they just take way
too long to run.

Juan

Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
> Sanchez, Juan wrote:
>> This part of the license would concern me.  Are all files of interest, 
>> by other authors, guaranteed to be BSD friendly?
>>
> 
> 
> Again, read LEGAL.  You will then find that:
> 
> regex when used with Ruby it is Ruby licensed, based on Onigurama.
> utils is BSD, credit going to Lucent Technologies.
> gc    is Public Domain (Boehmm), albeit now is so heavily modified 
> there's no resemblance to it any longer (probably the docs need updating).
> st    is Public Domain.
> 
> Other files may use Perl's Artistic License.
> 
>