[CMake] Changing output path for MSVC so that it does not contain
debug/release
Matthieu Brucher
matthieu.brucher at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 16:05:33 EST 2007
Thank you for the tip, I'll try that immediately.
The use for an extension is due to the fact that there are a lot of
additional data that must be in a special folder relatively to the build,
and that copying this data into each folder can be more problematic than an
extension :(
Matthieu
2007/2/16, Mike Jackson <mike.jackson at imts.us>:
>
> This is what I did when someone "required" this:
> # ---- Change the Suffix on the Generated Dylib
> --------------------------------
> IF (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
> SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES (About
> PROPERTIES SUFFIX ".plug_d"
> )
> ELSE (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
> SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES (About
> PROPERTIES SUFFIX ".plug"
> )
> ENDIF (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
>
>
> <rant>
> This is just completely NOT needed with any modern IDE or CMake. I know
> for a fact that VS 2003 and 2005 both will generate a "Debug" and "Release"
> folder placing the contents in those folders for each of their respective
> build types. Xcode on OS X will do the same thing. This obviates the need
> for adding "special" extensions to your libraries. But you say, I am on
> (Linux/BSD/Emacs/VI) and all I have is Make.. Well.. This is where CMake
> shines. Just create 2 build directories, one for release and one for debug.
> Each Directory will have its own complete build of the libs and executables.
> This will obviate the need for using naming schemes on your extensions.
> </rant>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20070216/0cc2cec2/attachment.htm
More information about the CMake
mailing list