[CMake] elseif request

[Jamie Jones]

On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 13:39 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> To my mind those additional endelseif statements in this alternative
> proposal go against the whole reason for my first proposal which is to
> reduce the clutter that occurs in the equivalent existing form now present
> in the language. Also, demanding those extra endelseif statements will
> confuse lots of programmers who are used to something very close to my
> original proposal for all other languages.  So my order of preference is (1)
> my original proposal, (2) the status quo, and (last) the alternative
> proposal you seem to be advocating.
> 
> What do others here think?  If after discussion there is strong support for
> my proposal (or any other that reduces clutter for if blocks in a way that
> is as consistent as possible with what other languages do), then I will be
> happy to make the appropriate wish-list bug report.

I think your proposal (1) would be useful for me.

Regards,
Yagisan
-- 
Jamie Jones
Proprietor
E-Yagi Consulting
ABN: 32 138 593 410
Mob: +61 4 16 025 081
Email: eyagi.consulting at gmail.com
Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com

GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209
Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E 6BB4 1BD4 AEB9 3091 0027 CEFA 4B6E 7209
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20060917/63ecfd62/attachment.pgp