[CMake] Re: Out of source build and KDevelop

[Alexander Neundorf]

> At 10:08 AM 10/18/2004, Alexander Neundorf wrote: 
> >> When you load the project into kdevelop, and you load the top level  
> >> project, does it also load the other projects?   Why do you want  
> >> them all to be called CMake?    
> >  
> >Well, I don't really want them all to be called CMake. That's just the 
> best 
> >way I  
> >found until now.  
> >  
> >> For example, cmake contains the Curl project  
> >> as a sub project.   Why should you load the project CMAke to build 
> Curl?  
> >> How does kdevelop treat these sub-projects?  Does it load them all 
when 
> >> you load the top one?     
> >  
> >"Loading the project" mainly defines the directory in which to call 
make. 
> So 
> >they  
> >will be "made" too.  
> >  
> >So, two points: finding better names for the project files and 
including 
> all 
> >source  
> >files of sub-projects in upper projects, right ?  
> >  
> >Bye  
> >Alex  
> >  
> >  
> >  
>  
> Yes, that sounds good.  To get the correct names, I think you have 
> to move the code to the global generator and basically remove the 
> kdevelop3 
> local generator. 
 
The attached version of the patch implements both things (correct project 
file names and including all files of all "sublevel" projects), but still 
in the local generator. 
 
To be honest I didn't really understand how/why to move th stuff into the 
global generator. I think it doesn now everything as expected. 
 
Bye 
Alex 
 

-- 
GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
+++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cmake.kdevelop3.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 12384 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20041018/8870667f/cmake.kdevelop3.bin