[Cmake] Re: [Dart] cDart anybody?

[Lorensen, William E (Research)]

I think a dart follow on would be much better in python than C++.

Just my opinion,

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Cedilnik [mailto:andy . cedilnik at kitware . com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 7:34 AM
To: ian . m . scott at stud . man . ac . uk
Cc: CMake; Dart
Subject: RE: [Cmake] Re: [Dart] cDart anybody?


Hi All,

cDart does not mean you have to use CMake same way as Dart does not. The
idea is that the testing could be done through C++ program and not from
Tcl.

				Andy

On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 05:21, Ian Scott wrote:
> > As Amitha wrote:
> > I was under the impression that people do use Dart without CMake. I
> > think this is a good thing. Dart has the potential to be useful in a
> > variety of contexts, ones where CMake does not necessarily play a
> > role.
> 
> There is a research group here (in my dept. at Manchester) that have been
> very impressed my research group's use of dart. I suspect they may adopt
> dart. However, I doubt they will use CMake, because they only use one
> platform.


_______________________________________________
Cmake mailing list
Cmake at public . kitware . com
http://public . kitware . com/mailman/listinfo/cmake