[cmake-developers] Current deficiencies of automoc
Sebastian Holtermann
seblist at xwmw.org
Mon Nov 14 07:25:18 EST 2016
Am 14.11.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Alan W. Irwin:
> On 2016-11-14 09:06+0100 Sebastian Holtermann wrote:
>
>> What probably could be done is to add
>> ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${TARGETNAME}_automoc.dir
>> to the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of the target and then generate all
>> #included moc file there, accepting the risk of intra target name
>> collisions.
>
> Hi Sebastian:
>
> Your compromise idea above sounds good to me!
>
Btw. I liked your
${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/
${TARGETNAME}_automoc.dir/
${HEADERPATHCHECKSUM}/
moc_${HEADERNAME}.cpp
approach.
It could be used for the moc_<autoname>.cpp files that are not
manually #included and therefore can have any name.
Over the current
${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/
${TARGETNAME}_automoc.dir/
moc_${HEADERNAME}_${HEADERPATHCHECKSUM}.cpp
scheme it has the advantages that
1) moc_<autoname>.cpp files are grouped by their source directory
2) ${HEADERNAME} is kept intact and does not get shortened
3) fewer weird looking checksum names ;)
1) and 2) are generally helpful to find and debug moced files I think.
There are a some other changes to the automoc system I would like to
propose / work on. I'm currently busy with an other project though.
-Sebastian
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list