[cmake-developers] ExternalProject: Use native paths as substitute for directory tokens
Kislinskiy, Stefan
s.kislinskiy at Dkfz-Heidelberg.de
Thu Aug 20 10:37:08 EDT 2015
Hi,
thank you for our suggestions. I am aware that I can solve my example differently and that it might look not directly connected the proposal, but well, it is an example just to show a single case and why it matters. :) I did not want to discuss the example itself. Working around here would just resolve a symptom.
My point is the overall problem that would persist: A big part of ExternalProject is to issue commands for predefined and custom steps. Those commands are supposed to be executed by the shell/command line. According to the documentation and the source code of ExternalProject, directory tokens are mainly supposed to be replaced in commands. It is my understanding, that it is a bug, if CMake isn't able to assemble these commands correctly. This would include usage of the correct path style of the OS for shell/command line commands. As directory tokens are replaced internally right before a shell/command line command is assembled, I can't see why this would be kind of "API-breaking". You cannot interfere in your CMake code with these internal replacements.
Therefore I would still prefer my solution as it is pretty simple without adding even more features to ExternalProject and in my opinion without breaking code in the wild. It is a true bug fix instead of a feature request for working directories, which is a different topic that just coincidentally arised because of my specific example I guess. The features you described wouldn't fix the actual bug.
As you were not sure if my approach would even fix my problems: It does of course and this is what I am currently doing and what I tested extensively before creating the patch. :) Regarding your quote from the add_custom_command documentation I can tell you that this is how things are currently done in ExternalProject and always were as far as I know, for example (from ExternalProject.cmake):
add_custom_command(
OUTPUT ${stamp_file}
BYPRODUCTS ${byproducts}
COMMENT ${comment}
COMMAND ${command}
COMMAND ${touch}
DEPENDS ${depends}
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${work_dir}
VERBATIM
)
Best regards,
Stefan
-----Original Message-----
From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-bounces at cmake.org] On Behalf Of James Johnston
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 15:37
To: cmake-developers at cmake.org
Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] ExternalProject: Use native paths as substitute for directory tokens
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-bounces at cmake.org]
> On Behalf Of Kislinskiy, Stefan
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 09:02
> To: David Cole
> Cc: cmake-developers at cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] ExternalProject: Use native paths as
> substitute for directory tokens
>
> Hi David,
>
> Example excerpt (it is not possible to change the working directory
> for
the
> CONFIGURE_COMMAND as it is fixed to the BUILD_DIR, which might not be
> sufficient):
This doesn't really directly have to do with your proposal, but what if an option was added to change the working dir of the CONFIGURE_COMMAND? E.g.
WORKING_DIRECTORY_CONFIGURE. And suppose you'd have it recognize the various tags like <SOURCE_DIR>, etc. This might be useful to add to other steps as well, and would be more portable than your solution which is using cmd.exe-specific commands. You'd want to audit for any resulting breakage (e.g. does ExternalProject make assumptions that the working directory of CONFIGURE is always the binary dir? - e.g. a relative path being used somewhere. And probably only allow specification of WORKING_DIRECTORY_CONFIGURE if a CONFIGURE_COMMAND was also specified, as the built-in commands certainly assume the default working dir.)
In your situation though, I'm not sure it's strictly needed. From your sample, it looks like you're building boost. In your case what if you:
* Use ExternalProject_Add_Step to bootstrap. You can specify a WORKING_DIRECTORY here. Note one problem: you can't do out of source build of b2, which breaks user expectations.
* Then use ExternalProject_Add_Step to build Boost.
Yes, using _Add_Step is somewhat of a workaround, but in this case, I've found it wasn't much of a burden at all. In fact the only case I can think of where it WOULD be a burden would be if the configure step is CMake. But then you wouldn't need to change the working directory; changing it would break CMake. In practice nobody will want to change WORKING_DIRECTORY unless it's a custom command and then it's easy to use _Add_Step anyway.
That said, it might still be considered a little undesired and so maybe my proposal above would be a better way to handle it.
Corrections from maintainers and others on the above commentary are welcome...
>
> set(bootstrap_cmd "<SOURCE_DIR>/bootstrap${shell_ext}"
> ${bootstrap_toolset})
>
> if(WIN32)
> set(bootstrap_cmd pushd "<SOURCE_DIR>" COMMAND ${bootstrap_cmd}
> COMMAND popd)
> endif()
>
> ExternalProject_Add(Boost
> ...
> CONFIGURE_COMMAND ${bootstrap_cmd}
> ...
> )
>From add_custom_command: "If more than one COMMAND is specified they will be executed in order, but not necessarily composed into a stateful shell or batch script."
So I am not sure your approach will work for you even if you fix the issue with path slashes.
James
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list