[cmake-developers] [CPackIFW] Adding QtIFW 2.0 Support (Technical Preview)
Konstantin Podsvirov
konstantin at podsvirov.pro
Wed Apr 29 09:57:07 EDT 2015
Hello dear developers!
Recently we learned the good news about the release QtIFW 2.0:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/04/07/qt-installer-framework-2-0-released
And I too was delighted at once. But then I was faced with an unstable work of the installer on Windows and it upset me.
I think QtIFW 2.0 as quickly as possible became better - you need to actively use and test in various situations.
On adding support QtIFW 2.0 now I work in a topic branch cpack-ifw-develop:
http://git.podsvirov.pro/?p=kitware/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpack-ifw-develop
All those interested can get acquainted with the code, but I want to submit online installers CMake based on this code, and built by ourselves :-) :
Two installer collected in Debian 8:
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-i386-online.run
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-amd64-online.run
And two installer collected in Windows 7:
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-win32-online.exe
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/cmake-master-win64-online.exe
Working with cpack-ifw-develop I will periodically update the online repository.
The presented version of CMake (CPackIFW) already know how to work with QtIFW 2.0 but not in full.
I would like to know from users CPackIFW and QtIFW what functionality demanded in the first place.
Suggest we discuss the quality of the generated configuration files.
Also available documentation:
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/doc/sphinx
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/doc/doxygen
When I decide that the support QtIFW 2.0 has reached an acceptable state, we will begin work on the integration of changes.
Waiting for answers, questions, suggestions!
--
Regards,
Konstantin Podsvirov
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list