[cmake-developers] Compiler features/extensions remaining/future issues

Daniel Pfeifer daniel at pfeifer-mail.de
Mon Jun 16 04:33:36 EDT 2014


2014-06-15 22:24 GMT+02:00 Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com>:

> Brad King wrote:
>
> > On 06/13/2014 05:19 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> 11) WriteCompilerDetectionHeader vs GenerateExportHeader
> >
> > IMO these two modules are solving orthogonal problems and should not
> > be mixed.
>
> I'm not sure I agree.
>
> GenerateExportHeader needs to know about deprecation in order to generate
> FOO_EXPORT_DEPRECATED and similar macros. So, they're not fully orthogonal.


Both provide macros depending on the compiler. From a users perspective
they are not orthogonal at all.
Furthermore, I would prefer export headers to be compiler independent.

cheers, Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20140616/367f09d5/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the cmake-developers mailing list