[cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

[Steve Wilson]

Ok, I’ve pushed the new changes.

8) One of the reasons I didn't add LINK_OPTIONS before was that I didn't 
know whether it should accept "--no-undefined" or "-Wl,--no-undefined", or 
both. Is the latter compiler-driver-specific? Is that irrelevant because the 
link option is tool specific anyway?

Forgot to answer this question.

I think that that diff between —no-undefined/-Wl,—no-undefined is mostly irrelevant because 
the option is tool specific.    What is less clear is how to go about changing the default
tool for the linker.


On Feb 4, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Steve Wilson <stevew at wolfram.com> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:49 AM, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> 
>>> 7) I've added two commits to your branch. Please squash them into the
>>> appropriate commits in your topic.
>>> 
> 
> My bad, missed that one.
> 
>> Oh, forgot this one:
>> 
>> 8) I get some unit test failures:
>> 
>> The following tests FAILED:
>>        85 - LinkFlags-dll_config (Failed)
>>        87 - LinkFlags-exe_config (Failed)
> 
> Working on this failure now.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20140204/99298178/attachment-0002.sig>