[cmake-developers] "Not in next" branches on the CMake stage...

David Cole david.cole at kitware.com
Tue Jun 19 16:00:16 EDT 2012


On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neundorf at kde.org>wrote:

> **
>
> On Tuesday 19 June 2012, David Cole wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Rolf Eike Beer <eike at sf-mail.de> wrote:
>
> > > On Di., 19. Jun. 2012 19:53:39 CEST, David Cole <
> david.cole at kitware.com>
>
> > >
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Alex and Eike,
>
> > > >
>
> > > > The following topic branches have been on the CMake stage for months,
>
> > > > without any movement. Are there further plans to move these topics
>
> > > > forward and get them into 'next' or are they simply abandoned at this
>
> > > > point...?
>
> > >
>
> > > Shouldn't there be a list here?
>
> > >
>
> > > Eike
>
> >
>
> > Uh, why yes, of course. Perhaps since it's after lunch now, I should
>
> > consider pouring myself a second cup of coffee for the day.
>
> >
>
> > (A call to 'ssh git at cmake.org stage cmake print' shows "next=0" for
> those
>
> > branches not in 'next' at any given moment....)
>
> >
>
> > # Not in 'next':
>
> ...
>
> > # NinjaEclipse | master=0 next=0
>
> At some point I want to get this working.
>
> I'm actually not convinced I'll continue on what I have there, or whether
> to start fresh.
>
> If it's a problem for you, feel free to remove it.
>
> Alex
>
>
Not really "a problem" -- just asking about them to find out the intended
eventual fate of each branch.

Thanks for your responses.


D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20120619/3c4dd0da/attachment.html>


More information about the cmake-developers mailing list