[cmake-developers] CTest vs. gcov

[Rolf Eike Beer]

[...]

> Ok, so much to the history behind everything, now the questions: was that
> the right approach? What does 'Covered="false"' actually means? Should we
> unconditionally send true for gcov files, too? This would at least give
> consistent results. Is it at the end a CDash bug? Or should CTest be fixed
> similar to the way I did it for my local build?

Anyone?

Eike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20120215/1aa9027e/attachment.sig>