[cmake-developers] OpenBSD specific patches
Brad King
brad.king at kitware.com
Mon Dec 3 08:00:04 EST 2012
On 11/30/2012 04:54 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> Thanks. Please format this as a patch series that makes changes
>> in logical groups (possibly only one file each) and explains their
>> purpose in the commit messages.
>
> a email sent to cmake-developers@ for each file touched with a commit message?
No, just please group the related changes that have a common explanation.
If two changes have different reasons then they belong as separate commits.
Then you can attach the entire patch series to one message if you want.
> A /usr/local/lib/qt3/bin/moc exists on my machine. I think that the
> OpenBSD environment (linker or libtool) takes care of it. David will
> confirm here. I notice all the FindQt3 patches are /usr/local.
This is an example of why we need commit messages to explain the changes.
>From reading the patch I have no idea why the path makes sense there.
> I am unfamiliar with PATH_SUFFIXES (and with CMake in general). I
> looked at FindBoost.cmake and FindGTK.cmake but they were all using
> PATH_SUFFIXES inside of find_path() whereas in the diff above it is
> inside a set(TCLTK_POSSIBLE_INCLUDE_PATHS). I am not sure how to
> proceed here.
The variable is used to consolidate options to later find_path calls.
The PATH_SUFFIXES option is documented in the command:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.10/cmake.html#command:find_path
Anyway, I think you can go with the change you already have and
someone else can refactor the paths later. This suggestion was about
a general improvement rather than just an OpenBSD port.
> Thanks, I removed the CACHE line.
Thanks.
-Brad
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list