[cmake-developers] slow regex implementation in RegularExpression
Brad King
brad.king at kitware.com
Wed Nov 16 15:05:14 EST 2011
On 11/16/2011 2:12 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
> This is how I run the tests (pseudocode):
> recomp()
> repeat 1000 times:
> regexec()
Thanks for the explanation.
> TRex -- 680ms
> PCRE -- 610ms ( with pcre_exec() )
> PCRE -- 990ms ( with pcre_dfa_exec() )
> re2 -- 0.085ms
> /usr/include/regex.h -- 0.075ms
> TRE -- 0.3ms
The performance variation is interesting. It is probably worthwhile
to use a profiling tool (such as valgrind --tool=callgrind and kcachegrind)
to see where PCRE is spending its time.
> Advantages of TRE:
> - API very similar to standard regex.h (i.e. easy to integrate with CMake)
> - supports wide characters
> - compiles on many platforms Windows, AIX, HP-UX, you name it.
>
> What do you think about TRE?
It looks like a promising candidate.
Thanks,
-Brad
More information about the cmake-developers
mailing list