[cmake-developers] cmake automoc breaks kde

[Stephen Kelly]

Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> > but this still means that even if we start to
>> > require cmake 2.8.7 for kdelibs4, we still need the standalone automoc
>> > (which I don't feel like maintaining).
>> 
>> Well, kdelibs4 is not really going to get any more releases. I'm not sure
>> it makes sense to change the cmake requirement for it, but that's more a
>> topic for kde-buildsystem. If you really meant frameworks branch, then
>> I'd say we fix solid and move on.
> 
> No, I meant kdelibs4.
> Still people will continue to build against it for some time (it's not
> even dead yet), and the cmake stuff in it should stay maintained.
> This would be easier if there was only one group of files (the ones in
> e-c-m), instead of two (kdelibs4 and e-c-m).
> See the mail for the FindQtMobility.cmake review...

I'll look into it.

> 
> ...
>> There are a great deal of warnings like:
>> 
>> /home/stephen/dev/src/grantlee/templates/lib/template.cpp:0: Note: No
>> relevant classes found. No output generated.
>> 
>> because moc is run on the cpp file (it is also run on the header of
>> course).
>> 
>> Is it possible to give a better warning from cmake in those cases? If
>> not, it's probably a big deal.
> 
> "not a big deal", right ?

Yes, sorry this was a typo. I meant not it's not a big deal if no better 
warning is possible.

Thanks,

Steve.