<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Florian Reinhard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:florian.reinhard@googlemail.com" target="_blank">florian.reinhard@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
In addition compilers upto 7.2 did not support anything else than coff<br>
abi. So i don't see any valid reason to add --abi=eabi. Even more you<br>
usually set your silicon for improved optimizer results with e.g<br>
set_target_properties(myTarget PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "-mv6740")<br>
and i see no reason not to add --abi=eabi there if one needs it.<br></blockquote><div><br>Well, EABI will most likely be upcoming as the default in the new TI versions. It will make no sense to use such an old legacy stuff mostly incompatible with the majority of the rest.<br>
<br>Also, 7.2 was released a quite while ago, more than 2 years. If one still uses that version, that is likely a call for troubles. Texas Instruments discourage that, at least in our case, anyhow.<br><br>By the way, Qt will have the EABI by default instead of the COFFABI. Here you can see the progress for that:<br>
<br><a href="https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51173">https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51173</a><br><a href="https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51233">https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51233</a><br>
<a href="https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51228">https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51228</a><br><a href="https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51078">https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,51078</a><br>
<br>... and more to come.<br><br>Laszlo <br></div></div><br>