<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hendrik Sattler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:post@hendrik-sattler.de">post@hendrik-sattler.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Am Dienstag 18 Januar 2011, 18:05:50 schrieb Mateusz Loskot:<br>
<div class="im">> On 18/01/11 16:15, David Cole wrote:<br>
> > Your confusion is that you are looking for a "2010" -- there isn't one<br>
> > -- there is "Visual Studio 10"<br>
><br>
> David,<br>
><br>
> This is indeed a mess in CMake.<br>
> There is no such product as Visual Studio 10.<br>
> Also, there is no Microsoft product named "Visual Studio .NET 2005".<br>
<br>
</div>10.4 million google hits, some on <a href="http://microsoft.com" target="_blank">microsoft.com</a> (although I wouldn't take that<br>
page as proper history indication), tell something different. I don' think all<br>
those authors invented the same name by accident.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
HS<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: <a href="http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ" target="_blank">http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake" target="_blank">http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>Obviously, practically speaking, they are one and the same. The GUI and splash screen and about dialog all say "Visual Studio 2010 ...", but the installation directory is "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0".<br>
<br>I think the problem is... these strings are used as "-G" arguments to CMake. So... we cannot take away the -G strings that already work. But I suppose if we wanted to "make things consistent" someday within CMake, we could keep all the existing -G strings and keep them working the same as they do now, but then make the new and improved version have all consistent strings, referenced in a good order and with good phrasing.<br>
<br>Comments indicating what people think is "good" here would be most welcome in this bug entry:<br><a href="http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=10158">http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=10158</a><br><br><br>Thanks a lot,<br>
David<br><br>