I take that back..... Wait till tomorrow to follow this advice. :-)<div><br></div><div>Looks like Brad just pushed one more fix related to this issue to 'next' this afternoon.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:57 PM, David Cole <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david.cole@kitware.com">david.cole@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
There were recent bug fixes pushed to CMake 'next' (and I believe now to 'master' as well) to address the "<span style="font-family:arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse">headerpad_max_install_names" portion of this discussion. It should be passed with "-Wl," now so that it passes through to the linker on the Mac.</span><br>
<br><div>This particular error should go away if you use a nightly dev build of CMake.</div><div><br></div><div>Try that and let us know if you get farther with nightly cmake.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div>
<div>David</div><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Richard Wackerbarth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard@nfsnet.org" target="_blank">richard@nfsnet.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:<br>
<br>
> So, Darwin-icc.cmake is for the Intel compiler on the Mac. The intel compiler does not want and can not have the -Wl, syntax. These modules need to be updated to the new way of handling compilers.<br>
<br>
</div>If you will point me toward an example of "the new way", I will try to generate some patches for your review.<br>
<br>
BTW, I been looking at some of this code in order to get ObjC to compile correctly with different SDKs.<br>
<br>
In doing so, it appears that the cmSystemTools::FileFormat routines are no longer used anywhere.<br>
If I am correct, that code should be purged in order to minimize confusion.<br>
<br>