<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Clinton Stimpson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clinton@elemtech.com">clinton@elemtech.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Friday 26 March 2010 02:36:19 pm Sean McBride wrote:<br>
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:38:54 -0400, Simmons, Aaron said:<br>
> >While it will compile, the resulting binary needs to be compatible with<br>
> > 10.4.<br>
><br>
> It is a common misconception that one needs to use the 10.4 SDK to<br>
> create an executable that is compatible with 10.4. This is not so.<br>
><br>
> What you want to do is set CMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to 10.4. Don't<br>
> set CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT at all. Also, if you're deploying to 10.4, I<br>
> believe you need to use gcc 4.0, not newer. You'll also want to set<br>
> CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES as desired.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>I have a question about this...<br>
If the 10.5 SDK has python 2.3 and 2.5, and Mac 10.4 only have python 2.3, how<br>
does one use the 10.5 SDK but build against Python 2.3 within that SDK, so the<br>
binaries work on Mac 10.4?<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is this one a serious question, or are you just trying to make us smile late on a Friday....? :-)</div><div> </div></div>