Indeed, it is much more sophisticated, so it may be more bugged ;-)<br><br>>> shell i send you my scripts to take a look?<br>It's not necessary. I have downloaded the refactoring branch of yars. Thanks.<br><br>I comment my OCaml scripts and I send you, so that you could also have a look.<br>
<br>I have took a look at your UseOCaml script. I can't see why you copy ML files into the current binary dir before compiling them. Is there a reason ?<br><br>Keep in touch,<br><br>J. Bedouet<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Keyan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ml@pulsschlag.net">ml@pulsschlag.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I totally agree.<br>
<br>
Judicaël: how should we proceed? my first impression is that your usecaml.cmake is much more sophisticated then mine :) same for the findocaml.cmake scripts, as mine up to now does nothing more than to call a bunch of find_program commands.<br>
<br>
shell i send you my scripts to take a look?<br>
<br>
i have no problem with merging my stuff into your scripts, keeping you as main author, if there is anything useful for you.<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888">keyan<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 15 Jan 2010, at 02:39, Philip Lowman wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Keyan <<a href="mailto:ml@pulsschlag.net">ml@pulsschlag.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> hi,<br>
>><br>
>> ups ... i thought i replied to the list. thanks for the link. i will adapt my find-script to the requirements and maintain the package.<br>
><br>
> You should work with Judicaël to combine the best of both of your<br>
> works together into one FindOCaml and UseOCaml script. There is no<br>
> sense having two of them out there.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Philip Lowman<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>