<div>Thank you for your quick reply.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Eclipse should be the one to fix this issue... Do you know if there is any request for it in Eclipse development?</div><div><br></div><div>So if I sum up what we have said for this topic, the best solution would be to use Method 2 to make sure we do not lose the SVN tags, but doing this way, we do not use the CDT4 Generator...</div>
<div><br></div><div>Am I correct Bill or do you have any other solutions?</div><div><br></div><div>Romain Chanu</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/10/11 Bill Hoffman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bill.hoffman@kitware.com">bill.hoffman@kitware.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Romain CHANU wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I have included Bill in this conversation.<br>
<br>
Bill, I think you are currently working on the development of CMake, could you answer our questions regarding the integration between Eclipse and CMake (cf. emails below)?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Alex has been doing most of the Eclipse support. However, the in-ability of Eclipse to support an out of source tree is not something CMake developers can fix. Is there something else you would want me to comment on?<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>
-Bill<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>